Everybody is trying to be more efficient these days. We want fuel efficient cars, energy efficient houses, time efficient schedules, and space efficient buildings. The whole point of being efficient is to use less of something, or make the most of what you have to work with. This is a great idea when we are talking about fossil fuels, but not such a great idea when we are talking about out bodies greatest source of energy reserve. Our bodyfat.

If your goal is to lose fat in the most time efficient way possible  you need to do something that expends maximum calories in minimum time. Makes sense right?  Well then why are most people that are trying to lose fat doing things that they are very efficient at. Remember if you are efficient at an exercise you will burn less calories per unit of time. It does not take long to get efficient at walking or running. If it  did  golfer would be some of the leanest athletes around. This is usually not the case.

The golfer that are lean do not get that way from all the walking and swinging they do. They usually  1) are young  2) workout with weights. The PGA actually has a workout trailer at all of their events and most of the players that are in shape have trainers they work with on a regular basis.

I am sure we have all seen the people that occupy the treadmills and spin bikes at the gyms day in and day out. Many of them religiously put in their 1-2 hours everyday but look no different than they did a year ago. They have become very efficient at that movement. Their body no longer needs to adapt so it doesn’t.

If I wanted to expend a huge chunk of calories over a given period of time a great exercise for me would be swimming. Now before you jump all over me and say that swimming is a endurance activity that is all about efficiency, trust me I know that.  I also know I am about as efficient in the water as a one legged man in an ass kicking contest. I don’t so much swim as try not to drown really. Someone that is a excellent swimmer could do dozens of laps in the time it takes me to do 2 lengths. They would be fresh as a daisy, I would be on the verge of cardiac arrest.  If I took swim lessons and practiced every day soon I would be able to do lap after lap as well.  This would be ideal if I wanted to be a swimmer. Since I am interested in body composition, becoming efficient at swimming would mean I am doing too much of it and need to do something else. That or tie a rock around my neck and proceed to fight for my life once again.

Practice makes perfect and that is what you are doing when you are doing a repetitive activity for a long time. You are practicing.  If you hit 1000 golf balls, you are practicing to become a better golfer, If you run 10 hours a week you are practicing to become a better runner. If that is your goal great.  If your goal is to look your best, try practicing something you are not good at, and change it often.  Have a great day.

kevin@kevinweiss.com

Yes it is true. Food producers do not care if you ever get a six pack. They don’t care if you lose fat at all. They don’t even care if you are healthy. In fact when it comes down to it, the producers only care about one thing when it comes to consumers. That they consume, and that they consume often.

If we cannot count on the people and companies who produce the foods we eat to watch out for our waistlines and health, who can we count on?  Where does the responsibility lie for making sure what we are consuming on a daily basis is serving our ultimate well being?  Is it the government agencies who have established the RDA’s?  No I don’t think so.  The fact is they have as much interest in your health as the food producers. Their interests lie more in making sure you consume lots of the products that are subsidized by government like corn, wheat, and soy. How you consume these products and in what form is secondary to the fact that you consume them, a lot of them.

If we can’t count on big business or government to make unbiased healthy food choices for us, who do we turn to? Who should make the final decisions on what goes into our mouths and how it is going to affect our “bottom line”? Guess what? It is that person staring back at you in the mirror.

Maybe nobody wants to hear it but if you are overweight or unhealthy it is  mostly if not completely your fault. Nothing affects your bodyfat levels and your health more than what you eat. Exercise is a close second but without proper eating on a consistent basis you will ultimately gain weight and lose your health.

Making healthy food choices can seem like a pretty daunting task in todays world. Everywhere we turn there are foods of convenience that, lets face it, everybody knows are not good food choices. You don’t need a degree in nutritional science to figure out french fries and ding dongs for dinner is not a good call.  But what about all the products that are have the words “natural” and “healthy” and “organic”  screaming across the packaging. Surely these must be good choices.  These term are really meaningless and are far more about getting you to buy the product than contributing to your health. The very fact that these products are in a package nearly guarantees they are not all they are cracked up to be. “Organic” or “whole grain” ding dongs are still crap and they will still make you fat. End of story.

Here is a simple way to evaluate foods. Test the food against these 3 rules and if it passes, its in your basket, if it fails its out.

1) Is it a food or a food product.

Most of the contents of any grocery store is not food but rather food products. Taking a whole food and processing it into another product typically removes any goodness the original food contained. As an example lets use oats. Oats on its own is a highly nutritious food with lots of fiber, vitamins, minerals, and a good source of slowing digesting carbohydrate.  All things conducive to a lean and healthy body.  Take those whole large flakes of oats and grind it into a flour, remove the fiber so you have a nice fine consistency,  bleach it so it is all the same color, add sugar, salt and a host of other preservatives, form it into a shape appealing to the eye and put it in a box. Now you have a whole grain oat cereal. Because studies have shown that oats can reduce cholesterol and reducing cholesterol may prevent heart disease lets put a government approved heart healthy badge on it just for good measure. It should be easy to see although these foods both contain oats, that is where the similarities end. This actually leads right into the next rule.

2)Does it have more than 5 ingredients.

The more processed a food is the worse it is going to be for your health and your waistline.  The more processed the food the more ingredients will be added to ensure that product can stay on the shelf longer without spoiling. The longer it can stay on the shelf, the more profit is made because of factors like central manufacturing,shipping, and storage facilities. A loaf of wonderbread can be shipped across the country, sit on the shelf in a warehouse or in the store for days or weeks, and still be sold as soft and white as the day it was made. It also has over 20 ingredients, most of which no one but a chemical scientist would even know what they were, that ensure it will remain soft and white for a long time. Try leaving a loaf of homemade whole grain bread on your counter for a week and see what happens. Hope you are not allergic to penicillin.

Ideally it would be nice to pick foods that only have one ingredient.  A whole apple contains apple, a steak contains steak for example. This is not always possible though.  If you make a effort to fill your cart with as little “ingredients” as possible and stick to food, you will be way ahead of the game. No need to count calories or gram of protein or carbs. Try counting ingredients. Its easier and it works.

3)Could I pick it, dig it from the ground, or chase it down.

This is the simplest rule of all but it is also very effective.  You can put any food to this test and if it passes you are pretty much guaranteed a wise choice.  You can pick apples, dig potatoes or carrots from the ground, or chase down a chicken.  There is no Apple Cinnamon Cheerio tree, no french fries in the garden, and no chicken nuggets, or tofurkey running around in the barnyard.  All of these products started out as whole foods but after processing they are now products.  See rule 1.

Using these guidelines to chose your food takes out most of the guess work and make counting calories a thing of the past. No eliminating foods based on macro-nutrient profile but instead eliminating “non nutrient food”.  Give it a try. Your health and your waistline will thank you.

Have a custom diet designed for you

kevin@kevinweiss.com

In the previous post we discuss the Glycemic Index and its short comings. Of course when a flaw is found with a system an alternative is proposed that fixes these problems.  Walla!! the Glycemic Load Index or GL.  Lets see if this hold the answers to what foods we should be choosing for those ripped abs and tight butts.  First things first though. What exactly is the GL?

The glycemic load (GL) is a relatively new way to assess the impact of carbohydrate consumption that takes the glycemic index into account, but gives a fuller picture than does glycemic index alone. A GI value tells you only how rapidly a particular carbohydrate turns into sugar. It doesn’t tell you how much of that carbohydrate is in a serving of a particular food. You need to know both things to understand a food’s effect on blood sugar. That is where glycemic load comes in. The carbohydrate in watermelon, for example, has a high GI. But there isn’t a lot of it, so watermelon’s glycemic load is relatively low. A GL of 20 or more is high, a GL of 11 to 19 inclusive is medium, and a GL of 10 or less is low. Many foods that were previously shunned because of their high GI, were found to have a relatively low GL. Some examples of these foods are carrots, parsnips,  broad beans and pumpkin. Even rice, that would certainly be considered high GI, has a very low GL when a reasonable serving size of 75g is considered.

I think the GL is a far better gauge of a food than the GI. That being said, basing your food choices on the GL does not seem to solve all of your fat loss problems.  A year long study done at Tufts University that compared high GL to low GL diets, showed no significant bodyweight or bodyfat difference at the end of the study between the two groups. I would venture to say that if eating low GL food provided no difference over high GL food, arguing the effectiveness of the GL over the GI is probably a moot point.  Perhaps there is more to fat loss than just how a food affects or blood sugar and insulin levels? Maybe the ultimate answer is staring us right in the face but we can’t see it because of all the indexes, charts and graphs?  Next time I will look past all of these distractions and show what truly matters when losing bodyfat is your goal.

kevin@kevinweiss.com

Many people are familiar with the glycemic index (GI) but for those that are not lets start with a brief description. The glycemic index (GI) is a ranking of carbohydrates on a scale from 0 to 100 according to the extent to which they raise blood sugar levels after eating. Foods with a high GI are those which are rapidly digested and absorbed and result in marked fluctuations in blood sugar levels. Low-GI foods, by virtue of their slow digestion and absorption, produce gradual rises in blood sugar and insulin levels. It stands to reason that when fat loss is your ultimate goal a low GI diet is the path to the promised land and all high GI foods should be banished. Well maybe it is not that black and white.

One problem is how the GI of specific foods are determined. In a clinically controlled setting,  portions of food that contain 50g of carbohydrate are fed to people who have fasted overnight. The rise in blood sugar is measured every 15 minutes for 3 hours and then plotted on a graph. The area under the curve is measured and indexed against glucose at 100. That number is the food’s glycemic index. The higher the rise in blood sugar, the higher the glycemic index of that food. Although this makes nerds in lab coats happy, because of the controls that can be imposed, this is not a reflection of real life.  The digestion/absorption of previous meals, as well as the context of the carbohydrate food can drastically alter GI. Rarely are foods eaten in isolation and in the amounts that are seen in these tests. For example carrots, contain about 7% carbohydrate. This means you would have to eat more than 5 lbs of carrots first thing in the morning, by themselves, to get a GI rating. That’s not realistic. Also the GI of a food is different if it is cooked or raw, mashed or chopped, and more or less ripe.  Adding protein, fat or fiber to a carbohydrate further alters it GI.

If a lean, ripped physique is you goal, choosing food based on GI alone holds many pitfalls. Many high calorie foods have relatively low GI ratings. Ice cream, milk chocolate, and peanut M&M candies all have a lower GI rating than a yam.  I have designed many successful fat loss diets that included yams. I have yet to reccomend ice cream for someone seeking a ripped six pack.

Although I would like to take credit for exposing these flaws in the GI that is very far from the truth. These short coming have been known for a long time. Of course when a flaw is found with a particular system an alternative is proposed to pick up where the other fell short.  Enter the Glycemic Load Index or GL.  Next time we will see if this holds the answers to the never ending battle of the bulge. Have a great day.

Get a custom fat loss diet designed for you.

If you would like to contact me shoot me an email at kevin@kevinweiss.com

In the last post it was established that your body would not burn fat for energy when insulin is present. Since insulin is released every time we eat the trick is to get insulin levels back down as fast as possible after a meal so we can get back into fat burning land. How do we do that though? Well there are a few ways and if you are reading this blog,  you are probably already doing some of them. One of the obvious ways is to eat a low carb diet, but that has many drawbacks and needs to be implemented properly to maintain workout intensity. That is a subject all its own so I will address that in a future blog. What I want to focus on today is minimizing insulin resistance, and maximizing insulin sensitivity.

We already know that insulin delivers glucose to the muscle cells, fat cells and liver. That”s a good thing. When these cells become “resistant” to insulin’s effect, bad thing definitely start happening.  Muscle cells will not “uptake” the glucose to be stored as glycogen, the fat cells release more free fatty acids into the blood steam,  and the liver ignores the signal to stop producing more glucose. Elevated blood fatty acid levels, reduced muscle glucose uptake, and increased liver glucose production all contribute to elevated blood glucose levels. This causes the pancreas  to release more insulin and the vicious circle continues. Next stop, type 2 diabetes.  Hopefully, and quite likely, if you are reading this you are a long way from this condition and are just trying to get leaner. So lets look at how to maximize your insulin sensitivity so you can get those insulin levels down and burn off  some body fat.

Here are the main factors that will help increase insulin sensitivity:

• eating less saturated fat and fewer total calories.
• keep blood sugars stable throughout the day.
• drink little or no alcohol.
• exercise regularly
• not smoking
• reducing  stress.

Obviously doing the opposite of these thing will increase insulin resistance.  If you are doing all of the above CONSISTENTLY, good for you! You are well on your way to that six pack. If you have room for improvement, and most of us do, it could be the reason you fat loss goals have stalled.

Next week I want to talk about the glycemic index, how it relates to controlling insulin levels, and why it can be misleading when planning a diet. Have a good week.

A calorie of protein provides the same amount of energy to the body as a calorie of fat or carbohydrate.  This may in fact be true but lost in this broad statement is the fact that these different nutrients have different effects on metabolism and hormone secretion that are far  more important than just their caloric value. One of the major hormones influenced by nutrient intake is insulin.

So what is Insulin? In simple terms insulin is defined as a polypeptide hormone  that regulates carbohydrate metabolism.In simpler terms this means that after a meal, insulin deals with the rise in blood sugar by delivering it to the cells where it can be used for energy.  While this function is very important, insulin does much more. A study in 1999 showed that insulin is involved in many critical metabolic functions including, the breakdown and utilization (burning) of both dietary and body fat. Insulin was shown to inhibits fat breakdown, so when insulin levels are elevated your body cannot break down stored fat to be used for energy.  If you cannot burn bodyfat for energy it does not seem likely you will reduce your fat stores. Insulin must be the worst thing in the world! Anything that stops us from burning bodyfat and achieving that highly coveted six pack must be completely done away with! Not so fast.  That type of thinking gets babies thrown out with the bath water.  Over the next several posts I will discuss, 

1)Why and when insulin is bad.

2)Why and when insulin is good.

3)How to eat to minimize the bad and maximize the good.

Not sure how many posts this will be broken into as it is a massive subject but I hope you stay tuned.

Whether they want to admit it or not the vast majority of people exercise because they want to look better, period. Although the health benefits are undeniable, people  want the rippling six pack and the tight butts they see on the fitness magazine covers. In fact a recent survey found 60 percent of people would rather look good than feel good. I am not sure how “official” any of these findings are but my point is most peoples goals are based more on how they want to look than how they feel or perform. Right or wrong this is the way it is.

Keeping this in mind I am puzzled by the amount of people who desire one outcome but do training that is counterproductive to that goal. One example of this that I see everyday is people who desire the bodies of fitness models and physique athletes but train like endurance athletes. Any successful natural bodybuilder or fitness model I have ever trained has no idea what their best time for a 10k is. The reason for this is the training involved in achieving an elite time in a 10k or more will do nothing to help achieve a cover models physique. It will in fact hinder the process.  

The tight muscles possessed by cover models and natural physique athletes, are a result of  2 things

1)intense weight training

2)strict diets

The  weight training builds and maintains the muscles that give those bodies their shape and form and the diets strip bodyfat to low levels so these muscles show. Cardio training does have a place in their training but I would put it third in priority.  If the other two factors are in check the amount of cardio that is required is relatively low. 

To turn everything upside down and put the training priority on cardio does 2 things

1) drains the bodies recovery reserves

2) strips away muscle tissue, especially in the upper body.

It is easy to see why these two things are exactly what you don’t want when trying to get as lean and ripped as possible.

This is not an attack on endurance athletes either. far from it. In fact for them to train as physique athletes or natural bodybuilders do would be  equally ridiculous.  It is  a sure way to be the best looking loser of any race.

The overall point is you first have to decide what you are trying to accomplish, and then train specifically for that purpose. unfortunately you cannot have the best of both worlds. If you try to train for two apposing goals at one time, your end result will be mediocrity in both.

In the past 25 years I have heard it all when it came to cardio and fat loss or a least it seems like it.” Cardio must be done on a empty stomach first thing in the morning”. “steady state cardio will not make you ripped, you must do intervals” and of course the ever popular “cardio must be done in the target “fat burning zone” to be effective for fat loss. All  of these statements are backed up by reams of scientific studies, sometimes the same study is even used to prove two opposite opinions.

There is nothing wrong with scientific studies. Many amazing life changing things have been discovered,either on purpose or by accident, by such studies. It actually amazes me that so much time and money has been spent on the subject of exercise and fat loss. It seems like such a waste of time for the rats and untrained college students that are usually the subjects in the studies. Isn’t there cheese to be eaten and beer to be drunk? This would seem like a much better use of this resource.

Why not look at more relevant examples for the answers. People that actually get lean for a “hobby” Subjects that get themselves into single digit bodyfat land just for shits and giggles. Yes if you have not guessed it I am talking about the lowly bodybuilder. More specifically the natural bodybuilder because you can not attribute his extreme leanness to some pharmaceutical concoction. He or she has had to achieve this leanness through their training protocol. Surely the answer must lie with these speedo wearing hairless creatures. Funny thing though, when you examine the cardio stategies employed by this group.  Some swear by early morning cardio, some by slow long steadystate and others worshiped at the interval alter. There isno more agreement among this group than the lab coat wearing pencilnecks.

The simple fact is all of these methods have been used with success to achieve extreme leanness. But how can this be?  Surely there must be a best way! Well sorry, there is no best way to do your cardio to promote fat loss and here is why. cardio is not the biggest factor in getting your body to lose fat. In My opinion there are two factors that are much more important.

1) calorie deficit

 2) efficient metabolism

The single biggest fact that effects these two thing is, drumroll please, DIET. A properly designed diet can effectively put you into a calorie deficit while still maintaining a efficient fat burning metabolism. No matter what type of cardio you do if your diet is not on track you will not achieve extreme leanness, not even close. And the beauty is the better your diet the less cardio you will have to do before the six pack makes its grand entrance.

So lets end the debate about the hows, and whens, of cardio. Put some of that time into tightening up your diet and then do whatever type of cardio you chose. Just be careful not to step on any  rats doing wind sprints along the way.